<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: chronicle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/</link>
	<description>photography by davin risk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>i like the way the past is blurred.
I like the whole effect of the photo.

the blurring of the word past is like the past fading away.  I think its actually really deep imagery.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the way the past is blurred.<br />
I like the whole effect of the photo.</p>
<p>the blurring of the word past is like the past fading away.  I think its actually really deep imagery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theredhorizon</title>
		<link>http://lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>theredhorizon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 05:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>Given the large amount of blur in the picture already, I think leaving the sentance out of focus would be confusiing, as the eye would have nothing to latch onto. I think the DoF is good for this shot
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the large amount of blur in the picture already, I think leaving the sentance out of focus would be confusiing, as the eye would have nothing to latch onto. I think the DoF is good for this shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Carter</title>
		<link>http://lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 05:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>North America had a past ? :)

I would have liked it if the whole of that sentence was in focus. what do you think ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North America had a past ? :)</p>
<p>I would have liked it if the whole of that sentence was in focus. what do you think ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hemal</title>
		<link>http://lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>hemal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowresolution.com/2004/12/01/chronicle/#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>the image brings back memories of old days where i used to stick posters on the walls, advertising monthly competions in school and my competitors would tear them down!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the image brings back memories of old days where i used to stick posters on the walls, advertising monthly competions in school and my competitors would tear them down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

